The accounts have now been completed and will when time is available be sent out to all of our members as a proper report and newsletter combined perhaps. Your committee has been busy moving the LLAIA forward and since most decent minded members are happy with this approach as well as being delighted with each years accounts there was never any panic to get this years accounts completed. The accounts show another excellent year for the LLAIA as members have come to expect these days. It is only those with their own destructive hidden agenda that thought otherwise and attempted to place doubt in the minds of our members.
During this period there have been several unnamed persons who have contacted our accountants asking about the accounts and additional items they wanted information on. The information concerned private matters that simply should not concern them. The bailiffs wages is one instance which are a private matter between the committee and our bailiffs.
These culprits had tried to claim that our Michael Brady had told the accountants not to tell anyone anything with regard the accounts. This was simply not true, the woman they spoke to when they first made contact with our accountants was the same lady they made contact with the second time! Our accountant lady told them that neither Michael Brady nor anyone else connected with the LLAIA had made any comments at all with them regarding the accounts.
Not content with being found out to be lying the person then told the accountants the conversation was being taped. At this point the accountant lady passed the phone to the owner who informed the person that recording a conversation was illegal and he would inform the police of such conduct. The culprit then said he was only kidding the conversation was not being taped.
Another person who spoke in a polite voice attempted to obtain similar information. We make no comment with regard such instances other than they threaten our business relations with our accountants which is both professional and impartial. It also suggests that we have permit holders that are behaving unacceptably and have nothing better to do with their time than cause mischief and resentment. Information from the RRB website inferred they knew when the accounts would be finished etc.
We get our accounts done at a very competitive rate and this type of conduct puts that at risk. It will be members that will foot the extra bill AGAIN if we have to change accountants.
Specific members of the previous banned list were also spreading malicious rumours that Michael Brady had given the accountants specific instructions and that the stretch of fishings we were going to buy called “Wilsons” had been sold to someone else. They were also emailing the secretaries asking for information about Wilsons informing us that they wanted to fish Wilsons for “spring salmon fishing! and did not want to be prosecuted if the stretch was no longer ours. Such immature behavior does not warrant a reply.
We also had comments from specific members on the previous banned list with regard the accounts and why they were not ready and making ludicrous statements. When Michael Brady hands the accounts over to the accountants he does exactly that, there is no discussion or comments made or reference to the accounts other than when we require them to be finished.
This year because of the rants and raves of certain individuals the accounts were not completed in the time required. On this occasion Michael Brady did not give any deadline to the accountants for the completion of our accounts. In fact because of the lies, inferences and despicable accusations leveled at the secretary and his honesty and the committee with regard the accounts and transparency Michael Brady felt that it would be useful to inform the accountants of such allegations, perhaps the accountants would then be even more stringent to ensure the accounts were in order as they have always been year after year since we took over.
NEW TREASURER IS APPOINTED
Alastair Mair who is on the committee is the new treasurer. Alastair is a fully qualified accountant and will be dealing with the accounts and items relating to the treasurer in his capacity. This will allow the treasurer to attend the AGM and deliver the set of accounts instead of the chairman doing this. The association had saved money over the years doing this but with one of the committee now the treasurer this allows the treasurer to answer all questions relating to the accounts.
Since Alastair Mair has been on the committee he has listened very carefully in the first year of being a committee member and thereafter gave excellent input. We are positive he will make an excellent treasurer.
WILSON’S STRETCH IS NOW OWNED BY THE LLAIA
We can now report that Wilsons stretch on the river endrick has now been signed sealed and delivered. The LLAIA now owns another stretch of the River Endrick. This particular stretch is very important for us to own for a variety of reasons which will become clear in the years ahead.

Wilsons above Ballochruin Bridge now owned by LLAIA 2008: A superb stretch
This has been another ground breaking milestone in the history of the LLAIA which will be remembered for years to come.
We now OWN three stretches of the River Endrick that all of our members can fish forever more.
The Committee would like to thank everyone involved and hope that all members appreciate that we now have complete control of another stretch of fishing on the main spawning stream of the Loch Lomond system the River Endrick.
Whilst it is remarkable that we are in a position to be capable of purchasing any stretch of the River Endrick it does not mean we act stupidly and buy stretches at any price. That would be wasting members money which is something we could never be accused of doing period!

An angler fishes the Bridge Pool above the iron bridge at Ballochruin:Wilsons Stretch.
Therefore it is even more pleasing that we have managed to purchase this stretch at a good price that represents excellent value for the LLAIA and a very good deal for the owners. We will NOT pay overinflated prices for any stretch of fishings whether it is offered for sale or not.

Wilson’s: The whole stretch is about 525yds long. The Oak Tree Pool.
The Oak Tree Pool is the best pool in this whole area. A popular destination for Endrick members.
Note: The permitted fishing areas we have in our current maps remain unchanged. Members have full permission to fish these stretches throughout 2008.
THE STOCK IMPROVEMENT WORKING GROUP
The SIWG (Stock improvement working group) will be doing an update on the web fairly soon. It will be full of news and information. For that reason we will simply say well done to all the guys who help out and well done to Angus who has to work under restricted conditions with anything but a plentiful supply of water. Stocking our streams with salmon and sea trout fry has been taking place over a long period of years. We continue to improve with each years passing.

Hatcheries don’t work!!! The LLAIA Hatchery Fry doing well: May 2008
We firmly believe that hatcheries have a major part to play in certain fisheries that do not have an abundance of natural spawning available.
Peter Lyons our hard working Vice Chairman has continued to make a slow recovery after his stroke some 15 months ago. Hopefully Peter will get out on the loch soon and show us all how it is done with the modified lures he uses.
THE DISRUPTIVE ELEMENT WITHIN
Your committee had made a concerted and unanimous decision to ignore certain individuals some of whom were previously banned and whom we collectively felt were making a nuisance of themselves asking for information which was in our opinion done to slow the committee down and prevent continuing progress. They even had their friends emailing the secretary asking for ludicrous items that have little to do with them. We will continue to ignore such individuals, they offer nothing to the LLAIA and their constant undermining of this association is unacceptable to your committee. Those individuals were never an alternative and their recent ramblings only serve to enforce that view.
CATCH AND RELEASE OR CATCH AND “YOU DECIDE” TO RELEASE OR NOT?
When fish stocks reach critically low levels there can only be one option open to our membership and that is total catch and release. Thankfully we have no evidence to suggest that this is the case at present on the Loch Lomond system.
Last year we had one of the best grilse runs for many a year, hardly a reason to adopt catch and release is it?
Sea trout stocks have been under grave pressure for some years now which is why we acted sensibly and quickly applied a conservation protection policy many years ago. Our sea trout runs have up until last year been much reduced BUT far healthier when compared to many other Scottish Rivers and lochs that have sea trout runs.
Carrying out any conservation measures is pointless if it cannot be enforced. The ban on killing sea trout until 1st May has been very successful generally. Enforcement is always the difficult part and the most expensive part as to be expected. The Clyde Estuary is likely to be the first section to show signs of any recovery which was possibly why we were a little slow off the mark last year with effective enforcement in that particular area. This year we recognised in advance the need for more stringent enforcement in the Clyde Estuary with the appointment of another water bailiff. Our increased enforcement has worked a treat and has prevented many sea trout from being killed. It also ensures that all anglers have permits in that area.

Angus MacRitchie returning a big sea trout 2007 Loch Lomond
So it can be said that the LLAIA committee put in place measures that worked and gave much needed help at times when the negative effects of marine life such as sea lice infestation wreaked havoc with our sea trout stocks in particular.
Last year we saw a resurgence in the sea trout stocks and this year it appears to be continuing.
The latest news on the fish farm threats is that the slice treatment (sea lice treatment method) on the Clyde Area is currently been given glowing reports by those responsible for its administration on the fish farms in this region.
Apparently it is very successful and unlike other areas where it is anything but successful it has to be welcome news indeed, not quite so welcome as their closure would be but welcome nevertheless.
Over this last few years we have had quite decent rainfall over the spring months. Perhaps this has also had its effect on our sea trout fry in some of the small burns around the lochs basin. Some of us are of the opinion that once our sea trout fry start to gain weight in these smaller burns they make their way to the loch to enable them to survive on what would be a drought affected small burn.
This years spring drought might well affect our smolts as well as our fry so we can never afford to be complacent. The sheer number of Herons in and around the river Endrick this year has to be seen to be believed! It is rarely ever all good news is it!
Spring salmon stocks: How do our present spring salmon stocks compare to say twenty years ago? Does anybody really know for absolute certain? We have been waiting patiently now for about five years to find out this and other items that could help us to make a calculated and careful decision with regard our spring salmon stocks. Sure we can just rush in and make conservation measures such as catch & release throughout the whole spring. Will it conserve what stocks we have? Will those measures solve the problem? It is all very well carrying out such a policy in a strictly controlled fishery with a sparse population, try it in an area that has a large association and a large population in and around the area and then you will quickly realise that it is a different ball game altogether. Where does the income arise to allow the management to enforce such measures? Are there special grants available from the government to ensure such extreme conservation measures work? It is patently obvious that to be successful you have to ensure that the measures that work in theory also work in practice. If you make it catch & release without enforcing those measures you are either playing politics or you are managing the fishery by pretense.
One example of the theory which does not work in practice and lacks proper enforcement is clear for all to see on Loch Lomond!
The Park Authority has, quite rightly so, imposed speed restrictions on various parts of Loch Lomond. The Park Authority and rangers along with the presence of Strathclyde and Central Police combined have set about trying to enforce those restrictions. They have spent a huge amount of money in doing so. It is turning out to be an expensive operation. The Park Authority suggest they need much more resources (that means more money in our language) to properly enforce these restrictions. Their biggest problem is that their attitude to offenders is deeply flawed. They both have a NON CONFRONTATIONAL POLICY……. enough said.
Relate that to our current situation and it is clear that enforcing catch & release on all our permit holders would not be successful on a large area like Loch Lomond. We could make it partly successful if we decided to ban all members that broke the catch & release policy. Is that what we want?
There is a long tradition on Loch Lomond to go out on the loch and put in the hours to attempt to catch a springer. No one can suggest it is an easy thing to accomplish……well a few of our members this year might argue with that but you have done well if you catch a springer on either the River Leven or Loch Lomond in any season!
A large part of that pleasure is not only related to playing and landing the fish but it is a great pleasure to pass other boats receive the BIG O and be able to hold up the springer. The more boats you pass the greater enjoyment for all who are out fishing the loch that day. Thus the successful angler not only gives himself a large confidence boost but he injects a part of that enthusiasm and confidence to all the other boats. All of that disappears when you introduce catch & release. Do we really need this measure?
The committee of the LLAIA is divided on this issue. Possibly in equal measure which makes it even more difficult to come to a conclusion.
One of the main key issues is on choice. Some of us return almost every fish we land. We also return all coloured fish that are well past their best. If we want a fish for any particular reason we want to take it and feel perfectly entitled to do just that. We do not want that choice taken from us by anyone UNLESS it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that the fish stocks of that particular species is seriously in danger.
Every anglers definition of a coloured fish is different, so returning only coloured fish presents its own set of problems. That does not mean the committee are against any proposals to adopt catch & release of say coloured hen fish in October. It is whether we make it all fish whether they are coloured or not and can we enforce the measure on all areas. By the time October is upon us most fish caught are coloured whether they are caught on the loch the leven or the Endrick or Fruin. It is near impossible to enforce on the loch therefore do we concentrate on the tributaries then? Is that fair? Both the loch and the leven anglers have had a fairly lengthy season by the time October arrives.
A fish killed is a fish killed but a coloured fish landed on the tributaries might be the only class of fish available to our members who solely restrict there fishing to that particular stream! If we made it all hen fish to be returned then how would the members who fish the tributaries feel if they land a fresh fish?
Over this last few years we have had fairly dry years and the opportunity for sport on the Endrick and Fruin could be restricted to a matter of weeks. In those circumstances coloured fish may be the only fish available. Again we ask is it fair to remove the CHOICE from those members who fish only that stream yet pay the same as everyone else?
The majority of our members who fish the Endrick and Fruin return most fish caught. But FORCING them to return the fish is a different matter altogether. Is it fair?
Others on the committee feel that we are simply playing into the anti blood sport hands when we use fish as play things and start to adopt mandatory catch & release forever more.
With the sea trout we knew that the sea trout stocks would become seriously endangered by the fish farms and sea lice fiasco so we acted in advance of the expected impact and we believe it has saved our sea trout stocks and kept them at decent enough levels that they could make a quick recovery should conditions in the marine environment improve as they appear to have done with the slice treatment etc.
The Loch Lomond Fishery Trust was set up to research items that would/ could give us a clearer and better understanding of our fish stocks. Unfortunately it has had to spend this last five years establishing what the likely numbers of fish are in the system in general and to form a database to use in the future.
There is a huge difference between experimenting to gather useful information rather than gathering specific information that assists the fishery managers to protect/enhance or improve the fish stocks in the system.
We do not as yet know which direction the trust will proceed or give preference to but we hope they will give preference to projects and work that will improve or enhance the migratory fish stocks.
The other side of having a properly run Fishery Trust in our view is there has to be a proper code of conduct set up to ensure that any engineering works anywhere near the system (waterways) cannot be started without a proper survey carried out by our fishery trust. We must then have proper enforcement on those rules and on the work carried out. The trust must also inspect all the habitat to ensure there is no previous negative engineering work carried out and if so steps taken to reverse such negative works if at all possible. The recent fiasco with the building house scheme at Bonhill on the river leven whereupon no safety measures were taken when moving a large diesel tank which resulted in a major diesel spill on the leven which could be seen for miles out on the Clyde Estuary could have been avoided as could the illegal cutting of the trees that form good cover for the fish in that section of the river. Overseeing such works in and around our rivers is just as important as getting the preparative works done. In the case of the illegal tree cutting it should be noted that West Dunbartonshire Council had stipulated in the planning application that the trees were to remain in the area, yet the sub-contractors cut them down! Did the well known building firm use sub-contractors to enable them to achieve their objective (houses sell better if they have a nicer viewpoint) knowing that they would not be punished if the planning stipulations were broken by others and not them or was it just an unintentional error on the part of the sub-contractors?
There must also be a proper survey done on the number of fish eating birds in our system but mainly in our spawning streams and to work closely with the respective bodies to ensure the numbers are acceptable to the available sustainable food supply chain (numbers of small fish available) otherwise we have problems within the freshwater environment.

Herons appear to be increasing on the Endrick (2008)
Gravel extraction and the effects on fish has already been carried out by SNH. However it is currently left to the anglers and the LLAIA to monitor and report any contraventions. The fishery trust should also be ensuring that SNH are making a positive effort to see that none of the land owners are breaking the rules and extracting gravel at either the wrong times (throughout the close season) or when they are illegally breaking the rules and extracting when they do not have permission. Such enforcement does not go down well with some owners but that is not a reason to ignore it.
As can be seen the situation is rarely ever simply black or white. But we need action on these fronts NOW not further down the line. The fishery trust relies solely on grants. Grants are rarely available for the type of work that we feel SHOULD be done and so we either learn to live with this or we try to change that viewpoint.
Our top priority would be for the trust is to present us with the required information that indicates where exactly do our spring component stock reside within the system. If we can get that information it will allow us to concentrate on the spring component which most of us believe require the greatest protection.
We believe that current fishery trust management policy in a general sense has flaws that are deep rooted. Until they are improved upon we have to look at other ways to improve our fish stocks and relying on the fishery trust networks to do that for us is just not going to happen soon, it at all. That said we do believe that the fishery trust will start to obtain grants for items that will in time give us more information and that might well be vital in the years ahead. Anglers invariably expect a magic wand to be waved and somehow all problems will be solved….we wish. We have had to endure five years of getting all the required electro-fishing surveys completed by the fishery trust. Now hopefully we will start to see some kind of benefit, we hope so.
Whilst the mortalities in the current marine environment remain high we believe our hatchery policy over the years has managed to prevent our stocks from reaching critically low levels in any given year. We have yet to see any signs that the fishery trust is going to do anything to offset this, though it is early days yet in the greater scheme of things.
We also believe there are other ways to increase the fish stocks. We are currently working hard on this front…enough said!
The Committee LLAIA
All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.